Judgements

Our lawyers specialize across industries and legal practice areas

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “AYUSH CHAURASIYA vs State” had granted the bail to the Applicant where the recovered sustance fall under the category of non-commercial after FSL result, even the overall quantity comes out to be commercial

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Sapan vs State” had granted the bail to the Applicant and held that Custody of accused is not necessary when his CDR connectivity is with co-accused who is his real brother and no transcripts were placed on record. The Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused.

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Kalender vs State” had granted the bail to the Applicant and held that Custody of applicant is not required where the section 37 is not attracted and the recovery is non-commercial

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Irshad Sheikh vs State” had granted the bail to the Applicant and held that the recovered Ganja will not be considered as Ganja according to the defination of Ganja even though the FSL report gives the positive result

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Mohit Jaiswal vs CBI” had granted the interim bail to the Applicant and held that If the Medical Codition of the Applicant is crytical and the condition is not getting stable than the interim bail need to be considered even though the crime is henious in nature

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Rakesh vs State” had granted the liberty to the Petitioner to first approach the trial court and only the ground first adjudicated by the trial court will thereafter can be pressed in the High Court

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Savaliya Divyang vs Customs” had granted the Regular bail to the Applicant by observing that the Applicant is behinds the bars only on the basis of the disclosure statement and to keep him further in wait of the chargesheet will be injustice to him

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Mohit Jaiswal vs CBI” had granted the Regular bail to the Applicant on the non compliance of sec 42 as the first information was never being written down by the CBI which create a suspicioun on the case of the CBI

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “Ram hari rai vs State” had granted the Regular bail to the Applicant by observing that the Applicant was arrested only on the basis of the disclosure statement and mainly the grounds for arrest which is the right of the Applicant were not served to the Applicant

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “SAJIT THULUNG vs STATE” had granted the Regular bail to the Applicant on the non compliance of sec 52 wherewhich the ground of arrest were not given to the Applicant in written form which was the law laidown by the Apex Court

The Hon’ble court in the matter of “SUNIL LAMA vs State” had granted the Regular bail to the Applicant by holding that its the right of the Applicant to get the ground of his arrest in the written format and non-compliance of the same will create the dent on the prosecution case and give the benifit of bail to the Applicant

The Hon’ble High court of Delhi in the matter of “PAHALMAN BUDHA MAGAR vs State” had granted the Regular bail to the Petitioner on the ground that the Mandate of sec 52 is not followed and ground of arrest were never being given to the petitioner in writing